Tradecraft – Only the Strong Survive

PEOPLE LIKE TO ASK ME questions about the markets, whether I’m appearing on cable television or gabbing at a cocktail party. Is Dow 7000 cheap, or are we heading for a capitulation low? Is it time to buy tech stocks like Oracle (ORCL) and Cisco (CSCO), or short them even further into the single digits?

Here’s the thing: It doesn’t really matter what I think. It matters what they think.

As we’ve pointed out before, good trading is built more on sober technique than hot stock tips. Investors must be confident enough to take a position, yet humble enough to abandon it just the same. After all, the market is constantly changing, and no matter how good our analysis might be, we can always be wrong. Whether you’re Abby Joseph Cohen or Ms. Cleo, the future is always unknowable and largely out of our control.

But while we can’t change the market, we can alter our position within it. And I can’t stress enough that the most important aspect of any trading decision is never the condition of the market, but rather that of your own position. For active managers not content to buy and hope, the trick is to be constantly moving toward a position of strength, both within an individual trade and within the marketplace at large. Just like basketball, chess or any other activity that requires focus, you know you’re in the “zone” of trading when you start playing for position, not for points. (more…)

Tagged with:
 

Tradecraft – Liquidity Is for Losers

NO MATTER AT what level you play the trading game, you’ve got to understand what business you’re really in. And when you buy XYZ Widgets at 90, you aren’t getting into the widget business. You’re getting into the business of providing liquidity to a company’s float — in this case, XYZ above 90.

What moves stocks, bonds or anything else is the relationship between demand and supply. By definition, traders and speculators profit by adding liquidity to illiquid markets. Doesn’t matter if it’s Cisco Systems (CSCO) or soybeans, traders narrow the spreads between the price at which someone’s willing to sell and the price at which someone else is willing to buy, bringing down the cost of execution. Trading isn’t about predicting the future, but about gaming the liquidity demands for a particular security. Generally speaking, I want to be long illiquid markets and short liquid markets.

First, a little background. You can’t imagine how drastically the liquidity picture has changed in just a few short years. Back in the early 1990s, when most market pros still referred to the Nasdaq as the “over-the-counter” market, stocks traded in eighths. That meant there were only eight “price points” within a particular dollar increment in which you could own Nasdaq stocks. And while 12.5 cents — one-eighth of a dollar — was the minimum spread between every price fluctuation, many stocks traded with half-point spreads or more. With mutual funds exploding in popularity and a huge influx of Internet-driven retail trade, this made making markets a very profitable business. In a sense, you had a big “edge” on every trade. (more…)

Tagged with:
 

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!

Visit our friends!

A few highly recommended friends...

    © 2009 ZF Capital. All rights reserved.